The Lookout News Logo
Election 2008 Logo


Banner for Vote No on T

Rosendahl Backs Prop T

By Jorge Casuso

October 23 – Calling it a regional call for support rather that an attack on Santa Monica City Hall, LA Council member Bill Rosendahl is throwing his weight behind Prop T.

Rosendahl said the measure – which would cap most commercial development in the city at 75,000 square feet a year for the next 15 years – would buy time for the City to implement the transportation and housing “components” needed to tackle traffic.

“The issue for us is coordination of our cities in all development issues,” said Rosendahl, who represents the 11th District, which surrounds Santa Monica. “We cannot continue to grow our commercial component without a transportation and housing component.

“This coordinated effort is the way to go,” Rosendahl said. “We need to stop development, take a deep breath and and (figure out) how do we work together as a region. I don’t want to create an issue of us against Santa Monica.”

Rosendahl said he was disturbed by the amount of money developers poured into the anti-T campaign, which raised $428,880 by October 1, most of it from out-of-town developers who want to build large projects in the city. (“Major Developers Bankroll Prop T Opposition,” October 9, 2008)

Fighting ballot initiatives “with money coming from all over the country is not a positive development,” Rosendahl said. “The money is coming in to kill this. This is of concern to me.

“It makes you cringe,” Rosendahl said. “If I lived in Santa Monica I’d be supportive. This is an assault on our way of life by these developers.”

Rosendahl, who is expected to formally announce his support of Prop T at a news conference Friday morning – said he was urged by council members Kevin McKeown and Bobby Shriver.

McKeown and Shriver, who Rosendahl called “courageous,” are the only members of the seven-member council who back the measure.

Rosendahl said he was also heartened that the City’s neighborhood groups all support Prop T, which is also known as the Residents’ Initiative to Fight Traffic (RIFT).

“I support the neighborhood groups in my city, and I support the neighborhood groups in Santa Monica,” Rosendahl said.

Although he had not taken a position, Rosendahl in an interview in July indicated his frustration with the traffic generated by Santa Monica.

“I’m outraged by the commercialization and gridlock in Santa Monica and the 11th District,” he said. “We have 200,000 cars going through every block in my district to get to work in Santa Monica.”

A resident of Mar Vista, Rosendahl added, “They raise revenue for their little town at the expense of gridlock on the Westside. My people are fed up with development.”

RIFT supporters demonstrate outside Public Library.

On Wednesday night, some 50 supporters of the measure held a demonstration outside the Main Public Library Downtown to protest what they say is massive amounts of developer money from as far away as New York, Dallas and Chicago.

“Do you think these developers care about our quality of life? No, they care about profits and residents are telling them to get their money out of our elections,” Diana Gordon, co-chair of Yes on Prop T told the crowd.

"They can’t win on the facts or the truth so they need truckloads of out-of-town developer cash to drown us with lies,” Gordon said.“Without Prop T, residents face more and more overdevelopment and the traffic that it brings. The City Council has failed to set limits on development, despite worsening traffic.”

Opponents of the measure contend that capping commercial development will do nothing to reduce traffic but will, in fact, eat into future City revenues that would go into funding schools and public safety, a contention supporters dismiss.

Opponents of the measure point to a wide-ranging coalition that includes five of the seven City Council members, school and college board members, two local education groups and State Senator Sheila Kuehl. Also opposing the measure are unions representing police, firefighters, teachers and municipal employees that fear the City could lose future revenues from developer fees.

Ted Winterer for Santa Monica City Council

Dr. Margaret


Vote # 158


Lookout Logo footer image
Copyright 1999-2008 All Rights Reserved.
Footer Email icon