Council
Set to Pass Emergency Ordinance
for Industrial Lands |
By Anita Varghese
Staff Writer
August 27 -- The City Council
is poised to adopt an emergency interim
ordinance Tuesday to require development
agreements for large projects in Santa
Monica's industrial corridor.
If Council members approve staff
recommendations, development agreements
would be required for all projects
that contain more than 7,500 square
feet of floor area or more than 15
housing, artist studio or single room
occupancy units.
Development agreements would also
be required for changes in land use
on parcels that exceed 32,000 square
feet in the Light Manufacturing and
Studio District (LMSD) and 15,000
square feet in the the Industrial
Conservation District (M1).
The proposed interim ordinance is
designed to address concerns about
the type, use and scale of development
projects currently underway in the
manufacturing and industrial districts,
also known as the “Industrial
Lands,” plus concerns about
the lack of public infrastructure
in the roughly 400-acre area.
“The area has neither the physical
layout nor the public infrastructure
in terms of streets, sidewalks, open
space and other amenities appropriate
for people who live and work there,”
said Eileen Fogarty, director of Planning
and Community Development, in a staff
report.
“It was never intended to develop
in piecemeal fashion into large, unplanned,
unbroken blocks of dense multi-unit
residential buildings without necessary
infrastructure and amenities.”
Current zoning ordinances are intended
to preserve the area’s existing
light industrial uses, encourage low-impact
entertainment industry facilities
and encourage creative arts/arts supportive
uses.
However, various development proposals
featuring a total of more than 1,000
multi-family housing units are pending
approval in or adjacent to the Industrial
Lands.
City planners believe these proposals
are technically consistent with current
zoning ordinances, but they violate
the original intent of the ordinances
and violate the direction Santa Monica
residents are going in the Land Use
and Circulation Element (LUCE) public
input process.
At a July Industrial Lands workshop,
the majority of participants said
they desire an environment where opportunities
for industrial uses and businesses
are preserved, light rail potential
is maximized, workforce housing is
placed in strategic locations and
pedestrian/bicycle/public transit
access is connected in neighborly
fashion to the rest of the city.
For some residents, an emergency
interim ordinance for the Industrial
Lands does not accomplish as much
as a citywide moratorium on large
development projects until LUCE draft
plans are tentatively scheduled for
a spring 2008 presentation.
“This is like spot zoning to
block some projects in some areas,
but not citywide, which is what the
state law on development moratoriums
envisions and what residents have
said they want until LUCE is near
being complete,” said resident
Art Harris.
“I’m not against development.
Developers are people too, just like
everyone else, and this interim ordinance
is not fair to those who have plans
for projects in only one part of the
city.”
California law gives local governments
the right to adopt development moratoriums
until land use and circulation updates
are completed.
The emergency interim ordinance focuses
on the Industrial Lands because City
planners believe the area serves as
a vital economic engine for Santa
Monica and is a site for opportunities
to enhance quality of life for residents
through a variety of means.
Development agreements are made between
developers and the City to ensure
that projects that exceed specified
zoning thresholds can still be built,
provided that developers agree to
a list of public benefits the City
determines to be reasonable given
the size and scale of the project.
Staff said development agreements
are superior to development review
processes because negotiated agreements
can be approved consistent with community
and City Council desires.
The City also has the flexibility
to define and shape projects on a
case by case basis as well as ensure
that large projects do not undermine
LUCE public input efforts currently
in progress.
|